WHITNEY STORES, INC. v. Summerford
393 U.S. 9, 89 S. Ct. 44
Opinion
WHITNEY STORES, INC., ET AL.
v.
SUMMERFORD ET AL.
Supreme Court of United States.
E. N. Zeigler for appellants.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
WHITNEY STORES, INC. v. Summerford, 393 U.S. 9, 89 S. Ct. 44 (1968).
393 U.S. 9 (WHITNEY STORES, INC. v. Summerford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Home Depot, Inc., and Gaylord's National Corporation v. William J. Guste, Jr., Attorney General of the State of Louisiana, Defendant
773 F.2d 616 (Fifth Circuit, 1985)
Zentgraf v. TEXAS a & M UNIVERSITY
492 F. Supp. 265 (S.D. Texas, 1980)
Hornbeak v. Hamm
393 U.S. 9 (Supreme Court, 1968)