Hornbeak v. Hamm
393 U.S. 9, 89 S. Ct. 47
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 14, 1968
Docket260
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 393 U.S. 9 (Hornbeak v. Hamm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hornbeak v. Hamm, 393 U.S. 9, 89 S. Ct. 47 (1968).
Opinion
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Hárlan, and Mr. Justice Stewart are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for argument.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Czajkowski v. State of Ill.
460 F. Supp. 1265 (N.D. Illinois, 1977)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
393 U.S. 9, 89 S. Ct. 47, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hornbeak-v-hamm-scotus-1968.