Whitman Co. v. Travers Bailey Co.

96 N.Y.S. 172
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedNovember 24, 1905
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 96 N.Y.S. 172 (Whitman Co. v. Travers Bailey Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whitman Co. v. Travers Bailey Co., 96 N.Y.S. 172 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After the trial had commenced and one witness had been examined, plaintiff moved to discontinue the action, which motion was granted, on payment of $10 costs. The defendant thereafter made a motion to correct the indorsement of the decision made by the justice on the summons by substituting $20 costs for $10 costs. The motion was denied, and . defendant appeals from the [173]*173order denying the motion. Municipal Court Act, Laws 1902, pp. 1585, 1586, c. 580, § 332, subds. 3, 6, and Blum v. O’Connor (Sup.) 84 N. Y. Supp. 207, apply here. Where the summons demands between $200 and $300, and the action is discontinued, the defendant gets $10 costs.

Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Goldstein v. Perlman
128 N.Y.S. 21 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 N.Y.S. 172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitman-co-v-travers-bailey-co-nyappterm-1905.