Goldstein v. Perlman

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Goldstein v. Perlman

128 N.Y.S. 21

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedFebruary 15, 1911

StatusPublished

This text of 128 N.Y.S. 21 (Goldstein v. Perlman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goldstein v. Perlman, 128 N.Y.S. 21 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

BIJUR, J.

Plaintiff sued for $248.25. After partial proof, he discontinued. Twenty dollars costs were awarded to defendant under section 332, subd. 2, of the Municipal Court act (Laws 1902, c. 580). The costs should have been awarded under subdivision 6. See Blum v. O’Connor (Sup.) 84 N. Y. Supp. 207; Whitman Co. v. Travers Bailey Co. (Sup.) 96 N. Y. Supp. 172.

Judgment modified, by striking therefrom the amount of $10 costs, and, as so modified, affirmed, with $10 costs to appellant. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BIJUR, J.

Plaintiff sued for $248.25. After partial proof, he discontinued. Twenty dollars costs were awarded to defendant under section 332, subd. 2, of the Municipal Court act (Laws 1902, c. 580). The costs should have been awarded under subdivision 6. See Blum v. O’Connor (Sup.) 84 N. Y. Supp. 207; Whitman Co. v. Travers Bailey Co. (Sup.) 96 N. Y. Supp. 172.

Judgment modified, by striking therefrom the amount of $10 costs, and, as so modified, affirmed, with $10 costs to appellant. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

128 N.Y.S. 21, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldstein-v-perlman-nyappterm-1911.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack