Whiting v. Butler
1 McGrath 793, 29 McGrath 121
This text of 1 McGrath 793 (Whiting v. Butler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Whiting v. Butler, 1 McGrath 793, 29 McGrath 121 (Mich. 1891).
Opinion
Held, that the right of a purchaser, on an execution sale, to a deed, after the expiration of the statutory period for redemption, is so complete and fixed as to be cognizable at law and enforcable by mandamus, and not to require a resort to equitable remedies.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Thomas v. Hamilton
1 McGrath 1234 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1894)
Smith v. Mayor
1 McGrath 1102 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1890)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 McGrath 793, 29 McGrath 121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whiting-v-butler-mich-1891.