Whiting v. Butler
1 McGrath 793, 29 McGrath 121
Opinion
Held, that the right of a purchaser, on an execution sale, to a deed, after the expiration of the statutory period for redemption, is so complete and fixed as to be cognizable at law and enforcable by mandamus, and not to require a resort to equitable remedies.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Whiting v. Butler, 1 McGrath 793, 29 McGrath 121 (Mich. 1891).
1 McGrath 793 (Whiting v. Butler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Thomas v. Hamilton
1 McGrath 1234 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1894)
Smith v. Mayor
1 McGrath 1102 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1890)