Smith v. Mayor
This text of 1 McGrath 1102 (Smith v. Mayor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
To compel -respondents to- rescind a resolution designating the place for holding the first election under the Act consolidating the Saginaws (Act No. 455, Local Acts of 1889), on the ground of the unconstitutionality of said Act.
Denied June 6, 1890, holding the Act constitutional, and [1105]*1105also, that the writ will not issue at the instance of one who has no special or specific interest in the matter; Ayers vs. State Auditors, 42 M., 422 (979); Drake vs. Regents, 4 M., 98 (1088); Russell vs. Inspectors, 4 M., 186 (1093); McBride vs. Supervisors, 38 M., 421 (1576); Delbridge vs. Green, 29 M., 121 (1609).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 McGrath 1102, 81 McGrath 123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-mayor-mich-1890.