Smith v. Mayor

Michigan Supreme Court

Smith v. Mayor

1 McGrath 1102, 81 McGrath 123

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided June 6, 1890·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

To compel -respondents to- rescind a resolution designating the place for holding the first election under the Act consolidating the Saginaws (Act No. 455, Local Acts of 1889), on the ground of the unconstitutionality of said Act.

Denied June 6, 1890, holding the Act constitutional, and [1105]*1105also, that the writ will not issue at the instance of one who has no special or specific interest in the matter; Ayers vs. State Auditors, 42 M., 422 (979); Drake vs. Regents, 4 M., 98 (1088); Russell vs. Inspectors, 4 M., 186 (1093); McBride vs. Supervisors, 38 M., 421 (1576); Delbridge vs. Green, 29 M., 121 (1609).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

To compel -respondents to- rescind a resolution designating the place for holding the first election under the Act consolidating the Saginaws (Act No. 455, Local Acts of 1889), on the ground of the unconstitutionality of said Act.

Denied June 6, 1890, holding the Act constitutional, and [1105]*1105also, that the writ will not issue at the instance of one who has no special or specific interest in the matter; Ayers vs. State Auditors, 42 M., 422 (979); Drake vs. Regents, 4 M., 98 (1088); Russell vs. Inspectors, 4 M., 186 (1093); McBride vs. Supervisors, 38 M., 421 (1576); Delbridge vs. Green, 29 M., 121 (1609).

Smith v. Mayor, 1 McGrath 1102, 81 McGrath 123 (Mich. 1890).

Pincite

1 McGrath 1102 (Smith v. Mayor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related