Whitfield v. State
This text of 69 S.E. 114 (Whitfield v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
1. The statement of the accused did not present the theory of involuntary manslaughter in the commission of a lawful act without due caution and circumspection; and a discussion of whether, if it had done so, the charge of the court on the theory of aceidenf (which was involved) would have been erroneous without going further and also charging as to the first-stated theory would be academic as applied to this case. Leonard v. State, 133 Ga. 435 (66 S. E. 251).
2. None of the other grounds of the motion for a new trial require a reversal. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
69 S.E. 114, 135 Ga. 248, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 501, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitfield-v-state-ga-1910.