Nathan v. State
61 S.E. 994, 131 Ga. 48, 1908 Ga. LEXIS 13
Opinion
(After stating the facts.) The charges on the subject of malice, upon which error was assigned, were given while the court was instructing the jury on that subject and explaining to them the difference between express malice and implied malice. The headnotes, when considered in connection with the preceding statement of facts, need no elaboration.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nathan v. State, 61 S.E. 994, 131 Ga. 48, 1908 Ga. LEXIS 13 (Ga. 1908).
61 S.E. 994 (Nathan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wilson v. State
219 S.E.2d 756 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1975)
Sparks v. State
71 S.E.2d 608 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1952)
Riggins v. State
20 S.E.2d 95 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1942)
State v. Merlo
173 P. 317 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1919)
Beach v. State
75 S.E. 139 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1912)
Whitfield v. State
69 S.E. 114 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1910)
Rhodes v. State
66 S.E. 887 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1910)