Whitehead v. Viacom, Inc.
This text of 63 F. App'x 175 (Whitehead v. Viacom, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
David L. Whitehead appeals from the district court’s orders dismissing his civil action and denying his motion for recusal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Whitehead v. Viacom, Inc., 233 F.Supp.2d 715 (D.Md.2002). We deny Whitehead’s motions for an evidentiary hearing, for injunctive relief, and to strike the Appellee’s informal brief, and dispense [176]*176with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
63 F. App'x 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitehead-v-viacom-inc-ca4-2003.