Whitehead v. Bradford & Ross

8 So. 642, 27 Fla. 475
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJanuary 15, 1891
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 8 So. 642 (Whitehead v. Bradford & Ross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whitehead v. Bradford & Ross, 8 So. 642, 27 Fla. 475 (Fla. 1891).

Opinion

Rasjey, C. J.:

This is an appeal in an action at law, and was entered on the 31st day of October last, and the citation was issued on the first day of the present month, January 1891, and served on the third day. Motion is-made to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the citation was not served twenty-five days before the first day of the present term, which was the thirteenth (13th) day of this month. The appeal not having been entered within thirty days before the first day of the term, the citation should have been issued and served at least twenty-five days before such day. Circuit Court Rule 101; McClellan’s Digest, -sec. 2, p. 843; Randall vs. Jacksonville Street R. R. Co., 19 Fla., 409. Had the appeal been entered within thirty days before the first day of the term, it might have been made returnable to a day in term admitting of twenty days’ notice. The statute construed in Randall vs. Jacksonville is as applicable to common law as it is to equity causes.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Velazquez v. State
648 So. 2d 302 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Priest v. Plus Three, Inc.
447 So. 2d 338 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 So. 642, 27 Fla. 475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitehead-v-bradford-ross-fla-1891.