Whited v. Warden

85 F. App'x 888
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 15, 2004
DocketNo. 03-7326
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 85 F. App'x 888 (Whited v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whited v. Warden, 85 F. App'x 888 (4th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Robert D. Whited, Jr., a Virginia inmate, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. An appeal may not be taken to this court from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding in which the detention complained of arises out of process issued by a state court unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue with respect to claims dismissed by a district court solely on procedural grounds unless the petitioner can demonstrate both “(1) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.’ ” Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir. 2001) (quoting Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000)). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Whited has not made the requisite showing. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the [889]*889facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Whited v. Dotson, Warden
543 U.S. 823 (Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
85 F. App'x 888, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whited-v-warden-ca4-2004.