White v. YOUNG DENTAL MANUFACTURING COMPANY

Missouri Court of Appeals

White v. YOUNG DENTAL MANUFACTURING COMPANY

211 S.W.3d 625, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 79

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 16, 2007

DocketED 88151

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 211 S.W.3d 625 (White v. YOUNG DENTAL MANUFACTURING COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

White v. YOUNG DENTAL MANUFACTURING COMPANY, 211 S.W.3d 625, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 79 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kelvin White appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial and Relations Commission (Commission) denying him worker’s compensation benefits for left leg deep vein thrombosis he alleges was the result of his work for Young Dental Manufacturing Company as a vulcanizer.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. The Commission’s decision is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. Judgment affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). 1

The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

. The motion for an award of damages for a frivolous appeal is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI