State v. Salik

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Salik

211 S.W.3d 625, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 67, 2007 WL 92576

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 16, 2007

DocketED 87399

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 211 S.W.3d 625 (State v. Salik) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Salik, 211 S.W.3d 625, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 67, 2007 WL 92576 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Sabr Salik (hereinafter, “Defendant”) appeals from the judgment entered after a *626 jury verdict finding him guilty of one count of statutory sodomy in the first degree, Section 566.062 RSMo (2000), and one count of attempted statutory sodomy in the first degree, Section 575.270 RSMo (2000). The trial court sentenced Defendant to twenty-five years’ imprisonment on each count, to be served concurrently. Defendant raises two points on appeal, claiming there was insufficient evidence to prove attempted statutory sodomy and there was plain error in failing to instruct the jury it had to find Defendant intended to insert a crayon into his stepdaughter’s genitalia.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find Defendant’s allegation of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Sabr Salik (hereinafter, “Defendant”) appeals from the judgment entered after a *626 jury verdict finding him guilty of one count of statutory sodomy in the first degree, Section 566.062 RSMo (2000), and one count of attempted statutory sodomy in the first degree, Section 575.270 RSMo (2000). The trial court sentenced Defendant to twenty-five years’ imprisonment on each count, to be served concurrently. Defendant raises two points on appeal, claiming there was insufficient evidence to prove attempted statutory sodomy and there was plain error in failing to instruct the jury it had to find Defendant intended to insert a crayon into his stepdaughter’s genitalia.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find Defendant’s allegation of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

211 S.W.3d 625, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 67, 2007 WL 92576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-salik-moctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack