White v. Weiner
583 A.2d 789, 525 Pa. 572
This text of 583 A.2d 789 (White v. Weiner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
White v. Weiner, 583 A.2d 789, 525 Pa. 572 (Pa. 1991).
Opinion
Dorothy M. WHITE, Executrix of the Estate of Alfred S. White, Deceased, Appellant,
v.
Roger D. WEINER, M.D., Robb S. Seto, M.D., Gerard Voci, M.D., Episcopal Hospital, Eli Lilly and Company, Walter H. Beadling, Jr., M.D., and Dr. Baruch.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Rodger L. Mutzel and J. Michael Sheridan, Media, for appellant.
Nina M. Gussack, Philadelphia, for Eli Lilly & Co.
Edward W. Madeira and Kenwyn Dougherty, Philadelphia, for Dr. Seto.
Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT, ZAPPALA, PAPADAKOS and CAPPY, JJ.
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Order affirmed.
LARSEN, J., dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
White v. Weiner
583 A.2d 789 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1991)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
583 A.2d 789, 525 Pa. 572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-weiner-pa-1991.