White v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

White v. State

184 S.W.2d 281, 147 Tex. Crim. 666, 1944 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1079

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in White v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 150 Tex. Crim. 546 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided December 20, 1944·No. No. 23011.·Published

Opinion

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was charged with incest. By proper averments it was also alleged that he had theretofore been convicted of two successively committed felonies less than capital, thus invoking the habitual criminal statute. (Art. 63 P. C.).

The jury «found appellant guilty of the crime of incest and also found that he had theretofore been convicted of the two felonies as averred in the indictment. Thereupon the court fixed appellant’s punishment at imprisonment in the penitentiary for life.

No statement of facts or bills of exception are brought forward. The proceeding seems in all things to be regular and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was charged with incest. By proper averments it was also alleged that he had theretofore been convicted of two successively committed felonies less than capital, thus invoking the habitual criminal statute. (Art. 63 P. C.).

The jury «found appellant guilty of the crime of incest and also found that he had theretofore been convicted of the two felonies as averred in the indictment. Thereupon the court fixed appellant’s punishment at imprisonment in the penitentiary for life.

No statement of facts or bills of exception are brought forward. The proceeding seems in all things to be regular and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

White v. State, 184 S.W.2d 281, 147 Tex. Crim. 666, 1944 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1079 (Tex. 1944).

Pincite

184 S.W.2d 281 (White v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.