White v. State
This text of 162 S.W.2d 100 (White v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Appellant was charged by complaint and information with the possession of an illicit beverage, to-wit: liquor to which no stamp had been affixed showing the payment of the tax due the State of Texas, and upon his trial was by the jury convicted and assessed a penalty of a $200 fine.
There is neither a statement of facts nor bills of exceptions in the record. The proceedings shown in the record appear to be regular, and there being nothing presented for review, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
162 S.W.2d 100, 1942 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-state-texcrimapp-1942.