White v. State

265 S.W. 1031, 98 Tex. Crim. 388
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in White v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 90 Tex. Crim. 584
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 5, 1924·No. No. 8921.·Published

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

— The offense is theft; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of two years.

The indictment appears regular. The facts are not at hand. No fundamental error is perceived, and there is no complaint by bills of exception of any errors in the procedure.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

White v. State, 265 S.W. 1031, 98 Tex. Crim. 388 (Tex. 1924).

265 S.W. 1031 (White v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.