White v. State

265 S.W. 1118, 98 Tex. Crim. 477, 1924 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 655
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in White v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 90 Tex. Crim. 584
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 5, 1924·No. No. 8922.·Published

Opinion

HAWKINS, J.

Conviction is for burglary, punishment being assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for eight years. No statement of facts accompany the record, and no bills of exception appear therein. Appellant filed a motion to quash the indictment. We find no vice whatever in it. A special charge also appears to have been requested, the refusal of which was excepted to; but, in the absence of a statement of facts, we are unable to determine whether the charge should have been given, and must assume that the court properly refused it. No errors appearing in the record, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

White v. State, 265 S.W. 1118, 98 Tex. Crim. 477, 1924 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 655 (Tex. 1924).

265 S.W. 1118 (White v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.