White v. State
Opinion
ORDER
David Germaine White (“Movant”) appeals the judgement of the motion court denying his Rule 29.151 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we find the motion court did not clearly err in denying Movant’s motion without an evidentiary hearing. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purposé. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2015).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
473 S.W.3d 209 (White v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.