White v. State

787 S.W.2d 785, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 358, 1990 WL 21182
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in White v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 1530
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 6, 1990·No. No. 56473·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

White v. State, 787 S.W.2d 785, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 358, 1990 WL 21182 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990).

787 S.W.2d 785 (White v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.