White v. State

784 S.W.2d 911, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 303, 1990 WL 17808
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in White v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 1530
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 27, 1990·No. No. 56793·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Delbert Edwin White, appeals from the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion after an evidentiary hearing. Appellant was convicted by a jury of two counts of involuntary manslaughter on October 25, 1985, and was sentenced to two consecutive seven year terms of imprisonment. His conviction and sentence were affirmed on direct appeal in State v. White, 722 S.W.2d 92 (Mo.App., E.D.1986).

Appellant’s sole point on appeal is his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel based on counsel’s failure to present evidence regarding the interaction between his heart medication and alcohol. We have reviewed this allegation and the record upon which it is based and we do not find the court’s findings and conclusions to be clearly erroneous. Day v. State, 770 S.W.2d 692, 695 (Mo. banc 1989). We also find that an extended opinion would have no precedential value and, therefore, we affirm the motion court’s denial pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

White v. State, 784 S.W.2d 911, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 303, 1990 WL 17808 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990).

784 S.W.2d 911 (White v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Day v. State
770 S.W.2d 692 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1989)
State v. White
722 S.W.2d 92 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1986)