White v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

White v. State

163 S.E. 312, 44 Ga. App. 799, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 523

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in White v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 43 Ga. App. 748 →

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided February 17, 1932·No. 22086·Published

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. Under the facts of the case special grounds 1 and 2 of the motion for a new trial (alleging that the judge in propounding certain questions to two witnesses expressed or intimated an opinion as to the facts of the case) are without merit.

2. The remaining special grounds and the general grounds of the motion for a new trial are not insisted upon in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, and therefore are treated as abandoned.

Judgment affirmed.

Lulc-e, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

1. Under the facts of the case special grounds 1 and 2 of the motion for a new trial (alleging that the judge in propounding certain questions to two witnesses expressed or intimated an opinion as to the facts of the case) are without merit.

2. The remaining special grounds and the general grounds of the motion for a new trial are not insisted upon in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, and therefore are treated as abandoned.

Judgment affirmed.

Lulc-e, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

White v. State, 163 S.E. 312, 44 Ga. App. 799, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 523 (Ga. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

163 S.E. 312 (White v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.