White v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

White v. State

163 S.E. 312, 44 Ga. App. 799, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 523

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 17, 1932

Docket22086

StatusPublished

This text of 163 S.E. 312 (White v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

White v. State, 163 S.E. 312, 44 Ga. App. 799, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 523 (Ga. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. Under the facts of the case special grounds 1 and 2 of the motion for a new trial (alleging that the judge in propounding certain questions to two witnesses expressed or intimated an opinion as to the facts of the case) are without merit.

2. The remaining special grounds and the general grounds of the motion for a new trial are not insisted upon in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, and therefore are treated as abandoned.

Judgment affirmed.

Lulc-e, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

1. Under the facts of the case special grounds 1 and 2 of the motion for a new trial (alleging that the judge in propounding certain questions to two witnesses expressed or intimated an opinion as to the facts of the case) are without merit.

2. The remaining special grounds and the general grounds of the motion for a new trial are not insisted upon in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, and therefore are treated as abandoned.

Judgment affirmed.

Lulc-e, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

163 S.E. 312, 44 Ga. App. 799, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 523, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-state-gactapp-1932.