White v. State
157 S.E. 889, 43 Ga. App. 103, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 204
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in White v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 43 Ga. App. 748 →
Opinion
The defendant was convicted of an attempt to commit burglary. The evidence, while circumstantial, was sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of his guilt, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial, based upon the usual general grounds only. The cases cited in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error are differentiated by their particular facts from this case.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
White v. State, 157 S.E. 889, 43 Ga. App. 103, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 204 (Ga. Ct. App. 1931).
157 S.E. 889 (White v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.