White v. State

19 So. 3d 444, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15613, 2009 WL 3316924

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm, without discussion, the trial court’s summary denial of claims two, three, four, five, six, and seven as raised in Appellant’s rule 3.850 motion for postcon-viction relief. We reverse the trial court’s summary denial of claim one. With respect to claim one, the trial court has failed to include a copy of the transcript pages referenced in its order and, therefore, we are prevented from concluding that Appellant’s claim has been conclusively refuted by the record. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D); LeBlanc v. State, 997 So.2d 508 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008).

Accordingly, the instant matter is remanded to the trial court for the attachment of records which conclusively refute Appellant’s first claim or, alternatively, in order for the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing on this ground.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.

SAWAYA, PALMER and COHEN, JJ., concur.