White v. State

946 So. 2d 131, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 493, 2007 WL 120077
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in White v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7547
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 19, 2007·No. No. 5D06-3808·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

White entered a plea of no contest in April, 1994, to burglary of a dwelling, aggravated assault of a person over 65 years of age, and attempted sexual battery. He did not file a direct appeal. He has filed 12 post-conviction motions and petitions, almost all of which attack his sentences. He now appeals the summary denial of his later motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Because his motion is untimely and successive, we affirm. White is hereby advised that the filing of anymore successive or frivolous pleadings will result in a show cause order pursuant to State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47, 48-49 (Fla.1999) (court can prohibit further pro se attacks on defendant’s conviction and sentence as sanction for prior repeated and frivolous motions after giving [132]*132him notice and reasonable opportunity to respond).

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN, PALMER and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

White v. State, 946 So. 2d 131, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 493, 2007 WL 120077 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

946 So. 2d 131 (White v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Spencer
751 So. 2d 47 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)