White v. State

16 So. 3d 1004, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 14420, 2009 WL 2777092
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 28, 2009·No. 1D07-6476·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges his conviction for second degree murder with a firearm. Because fundamental error occurred when the trial court gave the standard jury instruction for the lesser-included offense of manslaughter by act, which an average juror would understand as requiring the additional element of intent to kill, the appellants conviction is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings. See Montgomery v. State, 34 Fla. L. Weekly D360, — So.3d-, 2009 WL 350624 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009); Washington v. State, 18 So.3d 600, 2009 WL 975463 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009).

HAWKES, C.J., ALLEN, and CLARK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

White v. State, 16 So. 3d 1004, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 14420, 2009 WL 2777092 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

16 So. 3d 1004 (White v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rivera v. State
29 So. 3d 1139 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)