Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/White v. State

White v. State

987 So. 2d 176, 2008 WL 2755217
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in White v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 926 So. 2d 473 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 17, 2008·No. 1D07-4406·Published

Opinion

987 So.2d 176 (2008)

Patrick D. WHITE, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D07-4406.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 17, 2008.

*177 Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Jennifer J. Moore, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Proffitt v. State, 315 So.2d 461, 465 (Fla.1975) (a communication is not privileged if it is made in circumstances where the person invoking the privilege either knew or should have known at the time of the communication that it was being overheard by a third party); Black v. State, 920 So.2d 668, 670 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) (same, citing Proffitt).

WEBSTER, VAN NORTWICK, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

White v. State, 987 So. 2d 176, 2008 WL 2755217 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

987 So. 2d 176 (White v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Proffitt v. State
315 So. 2d 461 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1975)
Black v. State
920 So. 2d 668 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)