White v. State
930 So. 2d 721, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 6618, 2006 WL 1155171
Opinion
We affirm White’s conviction and sentence, without prejudice to raise a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, the only issue on appeal, by seeking relief pursuant to rule 3.850, Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure.
We recognize, and the state has not disputed, that White asserts a prima facie showing that the speedy trial time period had expired at the time the state filed the information. However, the record on appeal is not sufficient to support a conclusion of ineffective assistance of counsel without an evidentiary hearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
White v. State, 930 So. 2d 721, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 6618, 2006 WL 1155171 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
930 So. 2d 721 (White v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Et v. State, Dept. of Children and Fams.
930 So. 2d 721 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)