White v. State
830 So. 2d 944, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17156, 2002 WL 31557508
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 20, 2002·No. No. 4D01-4281·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
White appeals from the denial of a motion to suppress his confession. Although White entered a nolo plea specifically reserving his right to appeal, the motion is not dispositive. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140 (b) (2) (A) (i) (2000); Brown v. State, 376 So.2d 382 (Fla.1979); Weber v. State, 492 So.2d 1166 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); Werner v. State, 828 So.2d 499 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). In the absence of a dispositive motion or a stipulation by the parties to that effect, we must dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. See Weber, 492 So.2d at 1167.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
White v. State, 830 So. 2d 944, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17156, 2002 WL 31557508 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
830 So. 2d 944 (White v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mattos v. State
199 So. 3d 416 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Beermunder v. State
191 So. 3d 1000 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Maxwell v. State
917 So. 2d 404 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Mitchell v. State
830 So. 2d 944 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)