White v. State

667 So. 2d 266, 1995 WL 511607
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in White v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 606 So. 2d 1265
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 31, 1995·No. No. 94-241·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

White appeals from the sentence imposed after revocation of probation. We reverse on two of the three issues raised by the appellant. First, the sentence exceeds the maximum one cell bump-up permitted for a violation of probation. Williams v. State, 594 So.2d 278 (Fla.1992). Second, in State v. Summers, 642 So.2d 742, 744 (Fla.1994), the supreme court held that when probation is revoked,

credit must be given for time previously served on probation toward any newly-imposed probationary term for the same offense, when necessary to ensure that the total term of probation does not exceed the statutory maximum for that offense.

In the instant ease, appellant’s probation was revoked on counts II and III, and he was given new concurrent fifteen-year probationary periods for the two second degree felonies, which are punishable for a maximum of fifteen years each. Appellant, however, was not given any credit for time already spent on probation on these counts. We remand for resentencing and correction of the probationary terms in accordance with this opinion.

ERVIN, MINER and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

White v. State, 667 So. 2d 266, 1995 WL 511607 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

667 So. 2d 266 (White v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Summers
642 So. 2d 742 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1994)
Herrera v. State
594 So. 2d 275 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)