White v. State

624 So. 2d 353, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9417, 1993 WL 356909
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in White v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8198
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 17, 1993·No. No. 93-02682·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Marshall White, appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence, which he filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We reverse.

White pled guilty to capital sexual battery and to two attempted capital sexual batteries, which were committed in 1978, 1979, and 1986. White claims that points were scored incorrectly for victim injury. If true, he may be entitled to relief. See Karchesky v. State, 591 So.2d 930 (Fla.1992); Morris v. State, 605 So.2d 511 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). The trial court’s order without attachments does not conclusively refute White’s claim. We note, however, that the events surrounding White’s plea may be similar to those in Leverett’s case as discussed in the Morris opinion. Accordingly, we remand for further proceedings consistent with Morris.

Reversed and remanded.

RYDER, A.C.J., and DANAHY and PARKER, 33., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

White v. State, 624 So. 2d 353, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9417, 1993 WL 356909 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

624 So. 2d 353 (White v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Karchesky v. State
591 So. 2d 930 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
Morris v. State
605 So. 2d 511 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)