White v. State
661 So. 2d 137, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 10677, 1995 WL 594970
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in White v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 606 So. 2d 1265 →
Opinion
Willie “White appeals an order denying his motion to correct illegal sentence. We conclude that the appeal is timely, and reject the State’s argument to the contrary. On the merits we affirm. The sentence is not illegal. Davis v. State, 661 So.2d 1193 (Fla.1995). Assuming for present purposes that the motion should be treated as a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, relief is foreclosed by State v. Will, 645 So.2d 91 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
White v. State, 661 So. 2d 137, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 10677, 1995 WL 594970 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).
661 So. 2d 137 (White v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Davis v. State
661 So. 2d 1193 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1995)
State v. Will
645 So. 2d 91 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)