White v. State
408 So. 2d 786, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 18981
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 13, 1982·No. No. 81-1639·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Appellant contends that the court should have given him credit for the period of time he was in custody pursuant to his commitment as a mentally disordered sex offender under Chapter 917. We agree. § 917.-014(1), Fla.Stat. (1979); See McGuirk v. State, 382 So.2d 1235 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980).1
[787]*787Accordingly, we affirm the judgment but remand the cause with directions that the court give appellant credit for the time he spent in the mentally disordered sex offender program.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
White v. State, 408 So. 2d 786, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 18981 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).
408 So. 2d 786 (White v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. State
619 So. 2d 994 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)