White v. State
This text of 408 So. 2d 786 (White v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant contends that the court should have given him credit for the period of time he was in custody pursuant to his commitment as a mentally disordered sex offender under Chapter 917. We agree. § 917.-014(1), Fla.Stat. (1979); See McGuirk v. State, 382 So.2d 1235 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980).1
[787]*787Accordingly, we affirm the judgment but remand the cause with directions that the court give appellant credit for the time he spent in the mentally disordered sex offender program.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
408 So. 2d 786, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 18981, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-state-fladistctapp-1982.