White v. State
Opinion
Appellant was adjudicated guilty and sentenced to be confined at hard labor for the term of six months to five years after a jury trial on charges of unlawful escape from confinement.
A careful study and consideration of the record on appeal, briefs and oral arguments of counsel in this case reveals that the evidence wás sufficient to sustain a conviction under the charge of escape. The facts constituted a jury question and was resolved by the jury adversely to appellant, and this court will not substitute its judgment therefor.
The judgment appealed from is therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
244 So. 2d 747 (White v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.