White v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

White v. State

243 So. 2d 601, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5437

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 26, 1971

DocketNo. 70-270

StatusPublished

This text of 243 So. 2d 601 (White v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

White v. State, 243 So. 2d 601, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5437 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. [602]*602California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and. having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having filed his response thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order appealed is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. [602]*602California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and. having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having filed his response thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order appealed is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

243 So. 2d 601, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-state-fladistctapp-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack