White v. Southern Railway Co.

217 N.C. 793
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided April 10, 1940·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff has failed to bring her ease within the decisions in Henderson v. R. R., 159 N. C., 581, and George v. R. R., 215 N. C., 773, 3 S. E. (2d), 286. Harrison v. R. R., 204 N. C., 718, 169 S. E., 637, and cases there cited, and Cummings v. R. R., ante, 127, are controlling.

The judgment below is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

White v. Southern Railway Co., 217 N.C. 793 (N.C. 1940).

217 N.C. 793 (White v. Southern Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Henderson v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
75 S.E. 1092 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1912)
Harrison v. Southern Railway Co.
169 S.E. 637 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1933)
George v. . R. R.
3 S.E.2d 286 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1939)