White v. Simpson
112 So. 464, 93 Fla. 608
This text of 112 So. 464 (White v. Simpson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
White v. Simpson, 112 So. 464, 93 Fla. 608 (Fla. 1927).
Opinion
The decree appealed from is affirmed on the authority of Waterman v. Higgins, 28 Fla. 660, 10 South. Rep. 97; Clarke v. Hartt, 56 Fla. 775, 47 South. Rep. 819; Baars v. Alger-Sullivan Lumber Co., 81 Fla. 308, 87 South. Rep. 918; Godwin's Heirs v. Godwin,— Fla. —, 111 South. Rep. 240.
Affirmed. .
Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Godwin v. Godwin
111 So. 240 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1926)
Waterman v. Higgins
28 Fla. 660 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1891)
Clarke v. Hartt
56 Fla. 775 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1908)
Baars v. Alger-Sullivan Lumber Co.
87 So. 918 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1921)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
112 So. 464, 93 Fla. 608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-simpson-fla-1927.