White v. Simpson
112 So. 464, 93 Fla. 608
Opinion
The decree appealed from is affirmed on the authority of Waterman v. Higgins, 28 Fla. 660, 10 South. Rep. 97; Clarke v. Hartt, 56 Fla. 775, 47 South. Rep. 819; Baars v. Alger-Sullivan Lumber Co., 81 Fla. 308, 87 South. Rep. 918; Godwin's Heirs v. Godwin,— Fla. —, 111 South. Rep. 240.
Affirmed. .
Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
White v. Simpson, 112 So. 464, 93 Fla. 608 (Fla. 1927).
112 So. 464 (White v. Simpson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Godwin v. Godwin
111 So. 240 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1926)
Waterman v. Higgins
28 Fla. 660 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1891)
Clarke v. Hartt
56 Fla. 775 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1908)
Baars v. Alger-Sullivan Lumber Co.
87 So. 918 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1921)