Baars v. Alger-Sullivan Lumber Co.

87 So. 918, 81 Fla. 308
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 9, 1921·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having been heretofore submitted to the Court upon the transcript' of the record of the judgment aforesaid, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the cause having been re-argued by counsl for the respective parties pursuant to a rehearing granted by the Court, and the Court having again considered the record and being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there'is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that [309]*309the said judgment of the Court of Record be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

Taylor, Whitfield, Ellis and West, J. J., concur.

Browne, C. J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baars v. Alger-Sullivan Lumber Co., 87 So. 918, 81 Fla. 308 (Fla. 1921).

87 So. 918 (Baars v. Alger-Sullivan Lumber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tyler v. Tyler
108 So. 2d 312 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1959)
Saliba Et Ux. v. James
196 So. 832 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1940)
Grantham v. Grantham
191 So. 197 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1939)
Hawley, Et Ux. v. Kendall, Et Ux.
191 So. 10 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1939)
Wise v. Wise
184 So. 91 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)
Hassey v. Williams, Et Ux.
174 So. 9 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1937)
White v. Simpson
112 So. 464 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1927)