White v. Chapin

102 Mass. 138
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1869
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 102 Mass. 138 (White v. Chapin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
White v. Chapin, 102 Mass. 138 (Mass. 1869).

Opinion

Chapman, C. J.

The authorities cited by the defendant’s counsel do not sustain the position that the plaintiff was under the necessity of seeking any part of his remedy by going upon the defendant’s land and abating the nuisance caused by the obstructions which the defendant had there placed in the ditch He had a right to elect his remedy by action at law, and thereby recover all the damages which the nuisance had occasioned to him., Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. Baker
64 S.W.2d 321 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1933)
Fairfield v. City of Salem
213 Mass. 296 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1913)
Sweeney v. Montana Central Railway Co.
65 P. 912 (Montana Supreme Court, 1901)
Gates v. Northern Pacific Railroad
24 N.W. 494 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1885)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 Mass. 138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-chapin-mass-1869.