White v. Butterworth
78 F.3d 500, 1996 WL 103859
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedMarch 11, 1996
DocketNos. 94-2901, 94-2989
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 78 F.3d 500 (White v. Butterworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
White v. Butterworth, 78 F.3d 500, 1996 WL 103859 (11th Cir. 1996).
Opinion
BY THE COURT:
Appellant’s “emergency notice to the court for corrections,” construed as a motion to correct this court’s opinion of December 7, 1995, 70 F.3d 573, is GRANTED. As corrected, the first sentence of footnote one reads as follows:
White also appears to have made the argument that he was “in custody” as a result of the 1987 conviction because Alabama had placed a detainer on him for the conviction that should have run concurrently with his 1987 sentence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
White v. Butterworth
78 F.3d 500 (Eleventh Circuit, 1996)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
78 F.3d 500, 1996 WL 103859, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-butterworth-ca11-1996.