White v. Butler
This text of 171 U.S. 379 (White v. Butler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
WHITE
v.
BUTLER.
WHITE
v.
RUCKMAN.
Supreme Court of United States.
Mr. Assistant Attorney General Boyd and Mr. Joseph H. Gaines for appellants.
Mr. Charles J. Faulkner for appellees.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN delivered the opinion of the court.
Butler, the appellee in the first of the above cases, was a storekeeper of the United States at the Hannis distillery at Martinsburg, West Virginia.
Ruckman, the appellee in the second case, was also a storekeeper at the same distillery.
The bill in each case is substantially like that in White v. Berry, ante, 366, just decided. The relief asked by Butler and Ruckman is the same as that asked by Berry, and the decree rendered in behalf of each was the same as that rendered in Berry's case.
For the reasons stated in the opinion just delivered in White v. Berry, the decree in each of the above cases must be
Reversed, and the causes remanded with directions to dismiss the bills.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
171 U.S. 379, 18 S. Ct. 949, 43 L. Ed. 204, 1898 U.S. LEXIS 1610, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-butler-scotus-1898.