White v. Borough of Bernardsville

New Jersey Superior Court App Division

White v. Borough of Bernardsville

9 N.J. Tax 122

CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

DecidedJanuary 27, 1987

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 9 N.J. Tax 122 (White v. Borough of Bernardsville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

White v. Borough of Bernardsville, 9 N.J. Tax 122 (N.J. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Tax Court is affirmed for the reasons expressed by Judge Andrew in his thorough and detailed reported opinion issued on June 6, 1986, at 9 N.J.Tax 110 (Tax Ct.1986). We are entirely satisfied from our reading of the record that Judge Andrew’s findings of fact are amply supported by “adequate, substantial and credible evidence.” Rova Farms Resort v. Investors Ins. Co., 65 N.J. 474, 484, 323 A.2d 495 (1974). See also State v. Johnson, 42 N.J. 146, 161-162, 199 A.2d 809 (1964). We are also in complete accord with the judge’s determination that Clearview Estates, Inc. v. Mountain Lakes, 188 N.J.Super. 99, 105, 456 A.2d 111 (App.Div. 1982) is inapposite because here farming operations constitute a permitted use under the Borough of Bernardsville’s zoning ordinance. Bernardsville Code § 12-5.1(d).

Accordingly, the judgment of the Tax Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Tax Court is affirmed for the reasons expressed by Judge Andrew in his thorough and detailed reported opinion issued on June 6, 1986, at 9 N.J.Tax 110 (Tax Ct.1986). We are entirely satisfied from our reading of the record that Judge Andrew’s findings of fact are amply supported by “adequate, substantial and credible evidence.” Rova Farms Resort v. Investors Ins. Co., 65 N.J. 474, 484, 323 A.2d 495 (1974). See also State v. Johnson, 42 N.J. 146, 161-162, 199 A.2d 809 (1964). We are also in complete accord with the judge’s determination that Clearview Estates, Inc. v. Mountain Lakes, 188 N.J.Super. 99, 105, 456 A.2d 111 (App.Div. 1982) is inapposite because here farming operations constitute a permitted use under the Borough of Bernardsville’s zoning ordinance. Bernardsville Code § 12-5.1(d).

Accordingly, the judgment of the Tax Court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 N.J. Tax 122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-borough-of-bernardsville-njsuperctappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack