Whirlpool Corp. v. Glazer ex rel. Situated
134 S. Ct. 1277, 188 L. Ed. 2d 298, 571 U.S. 1196, 82 U.S.L.W. 3491, 2014 WL 684065, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 1484
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 24, 2014
DocketNo. 13–431.
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases
This text of 134 S. Ct. 1277 (Whirlpool Corp. v. Glazer ex rel. Situated) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Whirlpool Corp. v. Glazer ex rel. Situated, 134 S. Ct. 1277, 188 L. Ed. 2d 298, 571 U.S. 1196, 82 U.S.L.W. 3491, 2014 WL 684065, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 1484 (U.S. 2014).
Opinion
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Kurtz v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.
321 F.R.D. 482 (E.D. New York, 2017)
Neale v. Volvo Cars of North America, LLC
794 F.3d 353 (Third Circuit, 2015)
Joanne Neale v. Volvo Cars North America
Third Circuit, 2015
Leonard v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
115 F. Supp. 3d 934 (N.D. Illinois, 2015)
In re: Nexium Antitrust v.
First Circuit, 2015
AstraZeneca AB v. United Food & Commercial Workers Unions
777 F.3d 9 (First Circuit, 2015)
In re Whirlpool Corp. Front-Loading Washer Products Liability Litigation
302 F.R.D. 448 (N.D. Ohio, 2014)
In re Polyurethane Foam Antitrust Litigation
314 F.R.D. 226 (N.D. Ohio, 2014)
Phillips v. Philip Morris Companies Inc.
298 F.R.D. 355 (N.D. Ohio, 2014)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
134 S. Ct. 1277, 188 L. Ed. 2d 298, 571 U.S. 1196, 82 U.S.L.W. 3491, 2014 WL 684065, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 1484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whirlpool-corp-v-glazer-ex-rel-situated-scotus-2014.