Whirlpool Corp. v. Glazer ex rel. Situated
134 S. Ct. 1277, 188 L. Ed. 2d 298, 571 U.S. 1196, 82 U.S.L.W. 3491, 2014 WL 684065, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 1484
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 24, 2014·No. No. 13–431.·Published·Cited by 9 cases
Opinion
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Whirlpool Corp. v. Glazer ex rel. Situated, 134 S. Ct. 1277, 188 L. Ed. 2d 298, 571 U.S. 1196, 82 U.S.L.W. 3491, 2014 WL 684065, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 1484 (U.S. 2014).
134 S. Ct. 1277 (Whirlpool Corp. v. Glazer ex rel. Situated) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kurtz v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.
321 F.R.D. 482 (E.D. New York, 2017)
Neale v. Volvo Cars of North America, LLC
794 F.3d 353 (Third Circuit, 2015)
Joanne Neale v. Volvo Cars North America
Third Circuit, 2015
Leonard v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
115 F. Supp. 3d 934 (N.D. Illinois, 2015)
In re: Nexium Antitrust v.
First Circuit, 2015
AstraZeneca AB v. United Food & Commercial Workers Unions
777 F.3d 9 (First Circuit, 2015)
In re Whirlpool Corp. Front-Loading Washer Products Liability Litigation
302 F.R.D. 448 (N.D. Ohio, 2014)
In re Polyurethane Foam Antitrust Litigation
314 F.R.D. 226 (N.D. Ohio, 2014)
Phillips v. Philip Morris Companies Inc.
298 F.R.D. 355 (N.D. Ohio, 2014)