Whetsel v. State
This text of 2019 ND 237 (Whetsel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 10/03/19 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2019 ND 237
Byron Whetsel, Petitioner and Appellant v. State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
No. 20190034
Appeal from the District Court of Ransom County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Jay A. Schmitz, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Darla J. Schuman, Grand Forks, N.D., for petitioner and appellant.
Fallon M. Kelly, Lisbon, N.D., for respondent and appellee. Whetsel v. State No. 20190034
[¶1] Byron Whetsel appeals from a district court order denying his application for post-conviction relief. A jury found Whetsel guilty of murder and two counts of child abuse. Whetsel applied for post-conviction relief, alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. After an evidentiary hearing, the district court issued an order denying post-conviction relief. On appeal, Whetsel argues the district court erred in denying his application for post- conviction relief.
[¶2] We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), concluding the district court’s findings are not clearly erroneous, and the court did not err in determining Whetsel received effective assistance of counsel.
[¶3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Jerod E. Tufte Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jon J. Jensen
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2019 ND 237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whetsel-v-state-nd-2019.