Wheeler v. State

877 S.E.2d 565, 314 Ga. 484
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedAugust 23, 2022
DocketS22A1236
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 877 S.E.2d 565 (Wheeler v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wheeler v. State, 877 S.E.2d 565, 314 Ga. 484 (Ga. 2022).

Opinion

314 Ga. 484 FINAL COPY

S22A1236. WHEELER v. THE STATE.

PETERSON, Presiding Justice.

Eric Wheeler appeals his convictions for murder, aggravated

assault, and other crimes arising from the fatal shooting of Sonya

Corbett and non-fatal shooting of Albert Carter.1 Wheeler’s sole

1 The crimes occurred on April 26, 2003. On January 27, 2004, Wheeler

was indicted by a Fulton County grand jury for the malice murder of Corbett (Count 1); three counts of felony murder against Corbett (Counts 2-4); two counts of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, against Corbett and Carter (Counts 5 and 7); the burglary of Corbett’s home (Count 6); two counts of aggravated assault, against Carter and Lakeisha Hicks (Counts 8-9); four counts of possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony (Counts 10 (predicated on the aggravated assault of Corbett), 11 (predicated on the aggravated assault of Carter), 12 (predicated on the aggravated assault of Hicks), and 13 (predicated on the burglary)), and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon (Count 14). Wheeler was tried by a jury. During the trial, Counts 9 and 12, charging crimes involving Hicks, were placed on the dead docket. On May 17, 2004, the jury returned a verdict of guilty as to the remaining counts. The trial court sentenced Wheeler to life imprisonment on Count 1 and merged Counts 2-4 into it; those felony murder counts in fact were vacated by operation of law. See Malcolm v. State, 263 Ga. 369, 372 (4) (434 SE2d 479) (1993). The trial court purported to both merge Count 5 into Count 1 and impose a 20-year sentence on it. The trial court imposed a 20-year sentence consecutive to Count 1 on Count 6. It imposed a 20-year sentence consecutive to the preceding counts on Count 7 and purported to both merge Count 8 into enumeration of error on appeal is that the trial court erred in not

suppressing evidence of a gun, an empty ammunition box, and

bloody clothing that were seized as the result of an allegedly

unconstitutional search. But any error was harmless, because

Wheeler admitted shooting the victims. We thus affirm his

convictions. We have noticed an issue as to two counts that the court

purported to merge into other counts but also enter sentences on

those same counts; because we cannot resolve that issue definitively

Count 7 and also impose a 20-year sentence on Count 8. The trial court imposed 5-year sentences on each of Counts 10, 11, 13, and 14 to run consecutively to all of the preceding counts and to each other, for a total of life in prison plus 60 years. Wheeler filed a motion for new trial in June 2004 and, after appellate counsel was appointed, amended the motion in February and March 2020. After two evidentiary hearings, the trial court denied the motion on September 27, 2021. Wheeler filed a notice of appeal on October 7, 2021. This Court dismissed the appeal on November 23, 2021, because the two dead-docketed counts remained pending in the trial court. The trial court entered an order of nolle prosequi as to them on December 20, 2021. Wheeler filed another notice of appeal on January 10, 2022. The case was docketed to this Court’s April 2022 term. But because the trial court had denied Wheeler’s motion for new trial before the judgment was final, on June 1, 2022, we vacated that denial, again dismissed Wheeler’s appeal, and remanded the case to the trial court with direction to enter an order on the pending motion for new trial. On July 5, 2022, the trial court entered an order denying Wheeler’s motion for new trial, at which point the January 10 notice of appeal ripened. The case was re- docketed, this time to the Court’s August 2022 term, and submitted for a decision on the briefs. 2 on the record before us, we vacate the merger of and sentences on

those counts and remand for further proceedings.

The trial evidence showed that Wheeler was Corbett’s abusive

romantic partner. Following a violent incident on April 4, 2003,

Corbett ended their relationship. Because Corbett remained afraid

of Wheeler, family members often stayed at her home.

On the night of Corbett’s murder, Carter — Corbett’s cousin —

and Carter’s romantic partner, Lakeisha Hicks, were at Corbett’s

home and were in an upstairs bedroom when Hicks heard several

large “booms.” Hicks told Carter to get out of bed, at which point

they heard Wheeler threaten Corbett and yell, “I’m going to kill all

of you all.” When Hicks heard someone running up the stairs, she

leapt from a second-story window, breaking her feet in the fall.

Meanwhile, Carter saw Wheeler carrying Corbett up the stairs.

Wheeler started shooting at Carter, hitting Carter in the leg as

Carter also jumped out of the window.

Wheeler testified at trial and admitted that he shot Corbett

repeatedly, pausing between firing to berate her about how it was

3 her fault he was shooting her. Corbett suffered three gunshot

wounds and died. As Wheeler drove away from the home, he shot

the fleeing Carter five times from behind.

Wheeler claimed in this trial testimony that he had become

angry and kicked the door in after Corbett refused him entry. He

testified that Corbett pointed a gun at him while Carter brandished

a knife. Wheeler claimed that he and Corbett scuffled and he took

the gun from her. He testified that he shot Carter because Carter

was urging Corbett to kill him. By the time he shot Corbett, Wheeler

said, he had “lost it.”

While police were searching for Wheeler following Corbett’s

death, a detective contacted Wheeler’s sister, who directed police to

the apartment of Tamara Burley, one of Wheeler’s girlfriends. When

police arrived, Burley ran to them, saying, “He’s in there. Get him

out.” Five minutes later, Wheeler exited; police ordered him onto the

ground and handcuffed him. Burley gave police consent to search

her apartment, and during the search, police recovered a 9mm

handgun in a fireplace, an empty box of 9mm ammunition, and a

4 black garbage bag containing blood-stained clothing. Police did not

obtain consent for the search from Wheeler, who had been placed in

the back of a police vehicle.

Prior to trial, Wheeler filed a motion to suppress this evidence.

The trial court held a hearing midtrial, outside the jury’s presence.

According to police testimony, after Wheeler was taken into custody,

Burley signed a consent form authorizing officers to search her

apartment. Police testified that Burley told them she was “the legal

resident” of the home, and that although Wheeler had lived there

previously and refused to return his key, she had kicked him out

months ago and removed all of his belongings. But Burley testified

in the hearing that at the time of the search, Wheeler still lived in

the apartment, paid rent, had a key, and kept clothing there.

Wheeler argued that he had an expectation of privacy in the

apartment, especially in the bag containing his bloody clothing. He

argued that Burley’s consent without his own was insufficient to

authorize the entire search at issue under Georgia v. Randolph, 547

U.S. 103 (126 SCt 1515, 164 LE2d 208) (2006). See id. at 106 (“[I]n

5 the circumstances here at issue, a physically present co-occupant’s

stated refusal to permit entry prevails, rendering the warrantless

search unreasonable and invalid as to him.”). The trial court denied

Wheeler’s motion, and the evidence was admitted.

1. On appeal, Wheeler challenges the trial court’s denial of

the motion to suppress.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Christopher Owens v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2025
Blash v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia, 2024
Meadows v. State
885 S.E.2d 780 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2023)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
877 S.E.2d 565, 314 Ga. 484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wheeler-v-state-ga-2022.