Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Wheeler v. State

Wheeler v. State

842 So. 2d 300, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 5415, 2003 WL 1877980
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wheeler v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 880 So. 2d 1260 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 16, 2003·No. No. 3D03-694·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Major v. State, 814 So.2d 424, 428, 431 (Fla.2002)(eoncluding that neither the trial court nor counsel has a duty to advise a defendant that the defendant’s plea in a pending case may have sentence enhancing consequences on a sentence imposed for a crime committed in the future); Wood v. State, 750 So.2d 592 (Fla.1999)(providing that all defendants previously adjudicated would have two years from the date the opinion was issued (May 27, 1999) within which to file Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motions raising claims traditionally cognizable under coram nobis).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wheeler v. State, 842 So. 2d 300, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 5415, 2003 WL 1877980 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

842 So. 2d 300 (Wheeler v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Major v. State
814 So. 2d 424 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)
Wood v. State
750 So. 2d 592 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)