Wheeler v. Exchange Nat. Bank

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Wheeler v. Exchange Nat. Bank

1946 OK 33, 165 P.2d 614, 196 Okla. 405, 1946 Okla. LEXIS 379

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 29, 1946

DocketNo. 32343,

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 1946 OK 33 (Wheeler v. Exchange Nat. Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wheeler v. Exchange Nat. Bank, 1946 OK 33, 165 P.2d 614, 196 Okla. 405, 1946 Okla. LEXIS 379 (Okla. 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order and judgment of the trial court sustáining a demurrer to the answer and cross-rpetition and entering. judgment on the pleadings. The. judgment was entered March 27, 1945. Although notice of intention to appeal was given at said time, no order was made by the trial court extending the time in which to make and serve case-made. Thereafter, on May 3, 1945, the court entered an order overruling a motion for new trial and extending the time in which to make and serve case-made.

A motion to dismiss has been filed for the reason that the appeal is by case-made and this court is without jurisdiction to review the error's for the reason that the case-made was not served within the 15 days provided by 12 O.S. 1941 § 958, or any order extending the same.

The appeal must be dismissed. A motion for new trial is not necessary to enable this court to review the action of the trial court in rendering judgment upon the pleadings. Healy v. Davis, 32 Okla. 296, 122 P. 157.

Where a case-made is not served within 15 days from the date of the rendition of the judgment appealed from or some legal- extension -thereof, this court acquires no jurisdiction to review the errors complained of arising upon such case-made. Hawkins v. Steil, 172 Okla. 301, 45 P. 2d 147.

The appeal is dismissed.

GIBSON, C. J., HURST, V. C. J., and RILEY, BAYLESS, WELCH, CORN, DAVISON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order and judgment of the trial court sustáining a demurrer to the answer and cross-rpetition and entering. judgment on the pleadings. The. judgment was entered March 27, 1945. Although notice of intention to appeal was given at said time, no order was made by the trial court extending the time in which to make and serve case-made. Thereafter, on May 3, 1945, the court entered an order overruling a motion for new trial and extending the time in which to make and serve case-made.

A motion to dismiss has been filed for the reason that the appeal is by case-made and this court is without jurisdiction to review the error's for the reason that the case-made was not served within the 15 days provided by 12 O.S. 1941 § 958, or any order extending the same.

The appeal must be dismissed. A motion for new trial is not necessary to enable this court to review the action of the trial court in rendering judgment upon the pleadings. Healy v. Davis, 32 Okla. 296, 122 P. 157.

Where a case-made is not served within 15 days from the date of the rendition of the judgment appealed from or some legal- extension -thereof, this court acquires no jurisdiction to review the errors complained of arising upon such case-made. Hawkins v. Steil, 172 Okla. 301, 45 P. 2d 147.

The appeal is dismissed.

GIBSON, C. J., HURST, V. C. J., and RILEY, BAYLESS, WELCH, CORN, DAVISON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1946 OK 33, 165 P.2d 614, 196 Okla. 405, 1946 Okla. LEXIS 379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wheeler-v-exchange-nat-bank-okla-1946.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack