Hawkins v. Steil

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Hawkins v. Steil

1935 OK 565, 45 P.2d 147, 172 Okla. 301, 1935 Okla. LEXIS 242

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedMay 21, 1935

DocketNo. 25844.

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 1935 OK 565 (Hawkins v. Steil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hawkins v. Steil, 1935 OK 565, 45 P.2d 147, 172 Okla. 301, 1935 Okla. LEXIS 242 (Okla. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This action was tried upon an agreed statement of facts. After the judgment was entered on December 4, 1933, a motion for new trial was filed by the plaintiff, which was overruled off'March 5, 1934. Petition in error with ease-made attached was filed September 4, 1934. The case must be dismissed. This court held in Showalter v. Hampton, 122 Okla. 192, 253 P. 105, that where a cause is tried upon an agreed statement of facts no motion for new trial was necessary, and where one was filed and order made overruling the same, such order served no purpose to extend the time past six months from the date of -the rendition of judgment in which an appeal could be perfected. To the same effect see St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Nelson, 40 Okla. 143, 136 P. 590; Durant v. Nesbit, 59 Okla. 11, 157 P. 353; Okmulgee Securities Co. v. Osage Oil & Refining Co., 110 Okla. 263, 237 P. 105.

In Okmulgee Securities Co. v. Osage Oil & Refining Co., supra, this court held that a ease-made not served within 15 days after the rendition of the judgment appealed *302 from ot within some valid extension thereof presents nothing' to this court for review. The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This action was tried upon an agreed statement of facts. After the judgment was entered on December 4, 1933, a motion for new trial was filed by the plaintiff, which was overruled off'March 5, 1934. Petition in error with ease-made attached was filed September 4, 1934. The case must be dismissed. This court held in Showalter v. Hampton, 122 Okla. 192, 253 P. 105, that where a cause is tried upon an agreed statement of facts no motion for new trial was necessary, and where one was filed and order made overruling the same, such order served no purpose to extend the time past six months from the date of -the rendition of judgment in which an appeal could be perfected. To the same effect see St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Nelson, 40 Okla. 143, 136 P. 590; Durant v. Nesbit, 59 Okla. 11, 157 P. 353; Okmulgee Securities Co. v. Osage Oil & Refining Co., 110 Okla. 263, 237 P. 105.

In Okmulgee Securities Co. v. Osage Oil & Refining Co., supra, this court held that a ease-made not served within 15 days after the rendition of the judgment appealed *302 from ot within some valid extension thereof presents nothing' to this court for review. The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1935 OK 565, 45 P.2d 147, 172 Okla. 301, 1935 Okla. LEXIS 242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hawkins-v-steil-okla-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack