Wheatland Hills Corp. v. Morton

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Wheatland Hills Corp. v. Morton

199 So. 2d 122, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4827

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 9, 1967

DocketNo. 66-498

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 199 So. 2d 122 (Wheatland Hills Corp. v. Morton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wheatland Hills Corp. v. Morton, 199 So. 2d 122, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4827 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Circuit Court for Sarasota County had the power to place an equitable lien upon property located in Dade County which property belonged to a non-resident and was specifically described in publication of notice as property being proceeded against in a divorce suit in order to be subjected to the satisfaction of the claim for alimony and child support. Having been shown no reversible error, the decree appealed is affirmed. State of Florida v. Jacksonville, P. & M. R. R. Co., 16 Fla. 708, 722 (1878); Klausner v. Ader, Fla. App.1963, 156 So.2d 193; Webb v. Webb, Fla.App.1963, 156 So.2d 698; Wesner v. O’Brien, 56 Kan. 724, 44 P. 1090, 32 L.R.A. 289 (1896); Benner v. Benner, 63 Ohio St. 220, 58 N.E. 569 (1900); Reed v. Reed, 121 Ohio St. 188, 167 N.E. 684, 64 A.L.R. 1384. See Wagner v. Wagner, 110 U.S. App.D.C. 345, 293 F.2d 533, 538 note 5 (1961); Annotations 10 A.L.R.3d 212.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The Circuit Court for Sarasota County had the power to place an equitable lien upon property located in Dade County which property belonged to a non-resident and was specifically described in publication of notice as property being proceeded against in a divorce suit in order to be subjected to the satisfaction of the claim for alimony and child support. Having been shown no reversible error, the decree appealed is affirmed. State of Florida v. Jacksonville, P. & M. R. R. Co., 16 Fla. 708, 722 (1878); Klausner v. Ader, Fla. App.1963, 156 So.2d 193; Webb v. Webb, Fla.App.1963, 156 So.2d 698; Wesner v. O’Brien, 56 Kan. 724, 44 P. 1090, 32 L.R.A. 289 (1896); Benner v. Benner, 63 Ohio St. 220, 58 N.E. 569 (1900); Reed v. Reed, 121 Ohio St. 188, 167 N.E. 684, 64 A.L.R. 1384. See Wagner v. Wagner, 110 U.S. App.D.C. 345, 293 F.2d 533, 538 note 5 (1961); Annotations 10 A.L.R.3d 212.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

199 So. 2d 122, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wheatland-hills-corp-v-morton-fladistctapp-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack